A Domain-Specific Knowledge Representation, Acquisition and Reasoning Framework for Automatic Chinese Calligraphy Facsimile


Back to Homepage

I. Analyzing the faithfulness of our algorithm's facsimile capability


The columns from left to right respectively correspond to the original handwriting by a calligraphist (Xo), facsimiled results when our algorithm
has no access to any characters written by the calligraphist (X0); and facsimiled results when our algorithm has learned 10, 20 and 40 characters
written by the calligraphist as training samples, denoted as X10, X20, X40 respectively.

Back to Top     Back to Homepage


II. Results of phrase-facsimileing experiments


The sample characters in the personal handwriting database, shown for the first example below.


The facsimile result in the second row, compared with the original handwriting in the first row


The facsimile result in the second row, compared with the original handwriting in the first row


The facsimile result in the second row, compared with the original handwriting in the first row


The facsimile result in the second row, compared with the original handwriting in the first row

Back to Top     Back to Homepage


III. Results of poem-facsimileing experiments


(I) First half part of a poem, originally written by a calligraphist and used as our training samples


(II) Second half part of the poem, facsimiled by our algorithm


(III) Second half part of the poem, originally written by the same calligraphist, as groundtruth data for comparison

Back to Top     Back to Homepage


IV. The User surveys to verify our algorithm's performance


Please go to the websites for the user surveys:

  1. Facsimile Survey Level I (More Challenging)

  2. Facsimile Survey Level II (Much Easier)

Back to Top     Back to Homepage